Philippe durand ruel biography
- The Parisian art dealer Paul Durand-Ruel played an instrumental role in the rise of the Impressionists, backing these strikingly modern artists.
- In 1865, Paul Durand-Ruel (1831-1922) became responsible for the gallery founded by his father, Jean.
- He was the art dealer who bought and sold more Impressionist paintings than all other dealers combined, for which he has been claimed to be the inventor of.
- •
Archives Directory for the History of Collecting in America
Firm maintains extensive archives and will search archives for a fee.
of activity
1840-1850
1850-1860
1860-1870
1870-1880
1880-1890
1890-1900
1900-1910
1910-1920
1920-1930
search
Search Photoarchive
Search Worldcat
Search Library of Congress Name Authority File (LCNAF)
Search Vi
- •
Paul Durand-Ruel and the Twilight of Impressionism
In 1865, Paul Durand-Ruel (1831-1922) became responsible for the gallery founded by his father, Jean. Over the years, he established himself as one of the most renowned art dealers in Paris. He dedicated much of his life to defending and promoting modern art against those who advocated academic painting.
Durand-Ruel initially supported painters such as Eugène Delacroix and Gustave Courbet, as well as the known as the ‘Barbizon School’ (Camille Corot, Charles-François Daubigny and Jean-François Millet, among others), before embarking shortly afterwards on his most famous enterprise: championing the Impressionist artists, including Claude Monet, Auguste Renoir and Camille Pissarro. In the final decade of the 19th century, Durand-Ruel undertook a new (and less well-known) adventure: supporting and promoting a new generation of painters, that of Albert André, Georges d’Espagnat, Gustave Loiseau, Maxime Maufra and Henry Moret.
Heirs to Impressionism, these artists operated within a dynamic and stimulating artistic environment, where
- •
Inventing Impressionism: Paul Durand-Ruel and the Modern Art Market
Full of impressionist masterpieces, this exhibition looks at how art dealer Paul Durand-Ruel struggled to convince a sceptical public of the merits of these works and, in doing so, shaped today’s art industry
The National Gallery, London
4 March – 31 May 2015
by EMILY SPICER
“They may be madmen,” said the 19th-century art critic Edmond Duranty about the impressionists, “but the little finger of a fool is assuredly worth more than the entire head of a banal man.” Looking at a painting by Pierre-Auguste Renoir (1841-1919) or Claude Monet (1840-1926) now, it is hard to imagine impressionism ever being controversial. When you hear the word, the chances are that sunny colours, dappled light, rosy cheeks and, more often than not, an abundance of flowers, will spring to mind. The artists of this movement are now so popular that their paintings have become the go-to source for chocolate boxes and biscuit tins. But it wasn’t always this way.
There was a time when the French public was quite simply mystified by Monet,
Copyright ©hayduty.pages.dev 2025